What Would You Do Tomorrow?
A Scenario-Vignette Study of Library Workers' Responses to Intellectual Freedom Challenges. EdD, Plymouth State University, conferred May 2026.
A mixed methods study exploring how library workers reason through intellectual freedom challenges and what organizational conditions shape whether they can act on what they know.
149
Survey Respondents
20
Interviews
3
Library Types
2
Methods (Survey + Interview)
Research Questions
- RQ1: How do library workers make decisions and reason through realistic intellectual freedom challenge scenarios? What factors influence their choice?
- RQ2: What do participants' responses suggest about the potential usefulness and focus of future scenario-based training?
Key Findings
1. Knowledge-Feasibility Gap
80-97% selected policy-aligned responses, but beneath that consensus lies a gap between knowing the right action and being able to carry it out.
2. Preparedness is Structural
Feeling prepared depends less on personal knowledge and more on organizational conditions like administrative support, clear policy, and defined roles.
3. Symbolic Capital Shapes Response
Workers with more professional standing invoked policy as authority; workers with less standing followed scripts and deferred to supervisors.
4. Policy as Tool and Point of Failure
Policy is the primary resource but fails across five dimensions: legitimacy, clarity, accessibility, gaps, and administrative bypass.
5. Scenarios as Reflective Triggers
Despite modest usefulness ratings, four interviewees took concrete professional action directly prompted by the study's scenarios.
6. Emotional Labor is Under-Resourced
Emotional toll, fear of backlash, and identity-targeted challenges are predictable but no participant reported training for these dimensions.
7. Setting Shapes Barriers, Not Logic
All library types share the same core action sequence but operate within distinct authority structures.
The library workforce largely knows what to do but faces uneven organizational conditions for doing it.
Implications for Practice
- Training must address organizational conditions, not just individual knowledge
- Libraries need policy ecosystems, not just policy documents
- Scenarios should be used diagnostically to surface gaps before designing interventions
- Professional development should prepare workers for emotional labor
- Programs should build symbolic capital for paraprofessional and early-career staff
Interested in this kind of work?
I am happy to talk about learning leadership, instructional design, accreditation, and applied research. Reach out by email or LinkedIn.